Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Crane et al
| Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit |
| Rosemary A. Crane, Patrick D. Spangler, Patrick S. Jones, Peter C. Brandt, Philippe O. Chambon, Darren W. Cohen, Thomas L. Harrison, Gilbert H. Kliman, John E. Voris, Mark A. Wan, Jacob J. Winebaum and Epocrates, Inc. |
| 5:2013cv00945 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR LEAD COUNSEL'S FEE AND EXPENSE AWARD AND THE LEAD PLAINTIFF COST AND EXPENSE AWARD. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/17/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2016)
|
|
Filing
107
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 106 Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
104
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 103 Stipulated Protective Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)
|
|
Filing
99
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 98 Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)
|
|
Filing
97
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 96 Stipulation to Reschedule the Case Management Conference and for Extension of Time to Answer Third Amended Complaint.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)
|
|
Filing
95
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 82 Motion to Dismiss.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER. Signed by Judge Chhabria on 2/3/2015. (vclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)
|
|
Filing
87
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 86 Stipulation for Two-day Continuance of Deadline for Filing Reply.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria denying 67 Motion to Dismiss as moot and granting Plaintiff's oral Motion to Amend. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER re 70 Order on Stipulation RE 67 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Res ponses due by 8/11/2014. Replies due by 8/25/2014. Motion Hearing set for 10/2/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/25/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
|
|
Filing
69
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 66 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
61
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 39 Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend.(vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2014)
|
|
Filing
29
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 18 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
26
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
20
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 16 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
17
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 14 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
12
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
