San Francisco Baykeeper v. S.O.S Steel Company, Inc.
| San Francisco Baykeeper |
| S.O.S Steel Company, Inc. |
| 5:2013cv01113 |
| March 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: San Francisco Baykeeper v. S.O.S Steel Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: S.O.S Steel Company, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper | |
| Represented By: | Andrea Lynn Kopecky |
| Represented By: | Amanda Rosemary Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.