Mejia v. Bank of America, National Association et al
Jaime Mejia |
Does 1 to 100, inclusive and Bank of America, National Association |
5:2013cv01157 |
March 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT) re 22 Stipulated Request to Extend Scheduling Deadlines filed by Bank of America, National Association, FIA Card Services, National Association. Fact discovery cutoff extended to 11/29/ 2013. Designation of experts with reports extended to 12/13/2013. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports extended to 12/27/2013. Expert discovery cutoff extended to 1/10/2014. Last day for hearings on dispositive motions extended to 2/11/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/6/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2013) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING MEDIATION (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on May 29, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.