Wright et al v. City of Santa Cruz et al
| Haley Wright, Emily Wright and Jessica Wright |
| City of Santa Cruz, City of Santa Cruz Police Department and Joshua Singleton |
| 5:2013cv01230 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/5/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2015)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 91 INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/26/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2015)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER RE 97 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; VACATING HEARING ON 91 INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS MOTION TO DISMISS; AND SUBMITTING 91 MOTION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/16/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER APPROVING 93 STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Responses due by 12/31/2014. Replies due by 1/7/2015. Motion Hearing set for 1/22/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 12/23/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER GRANTING 70 THE INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/10/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
88
CASE MANAGMENT ORDER Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions set for 10/22/2015 at 9:00 AM. Reply Briefs for Summary Judgment 10/01/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/17/2015 02:30 PM. Jury Selection set for 1/11/2016 09:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 1/11/2016 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/06/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
74
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS **AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT**. Opposition due by 9/11/2014. Reply due by 9/18/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING 49 THE UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING 50 THE INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL AGENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/3/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
61
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 8/21/2014 01:30 PM. Motion to Dismiss Hearings set for 6/26/2014 11:00 AM. Hearings to be held before Judge Beth Labson Freeman Courtroom #3, 5th Floor 280 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 05/09/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 04/21/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER re 41 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Haley Wright. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/29/2014. (lhklc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh denying 19 Motion to Dismiss (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
