Cartier International AG et al v. Carter Cellars et al
Plaintiff: Cartier and Cartier International AG
Defendant: Christy Carter, Envy Wines, LLC, Carter Cellars, Mark Carter and Nils Venge
Case Number: 4:2013cv04544
Filed: October 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Vacating October 2, 2014 Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/29/2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Trial set for 07/20/2015 at 9:00 am. Last Day to Disclose Experts 01/20/2015 - Rebuttal Experts 02/20/2015. Fact Discovery Cut-Off 12/19/2014. Expert Discovery Cut-Off 03/20/2015. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions set for 05/21/2015 at 9:00 am. Hearings on Motions in Limine set for 07/09/2015 at 2:30 pm. Final Pretrial Conference set for 07/09/2015 at 2:30 pm. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/02/2014 at 1:30 pm. Hearings to be held before Judge Beth Labson Freeman Courtroom #3, 5th Floor 280 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 04/21/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)
February 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS ENVY WINES LLC AND NILS VENGE filed by Envy Wines, LLC, Nils Venge. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/13/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2014)
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Cartier International AG filed by Cartier International AG. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Allow Counsel for Plaintiff to Appear Telephonically at Hearing and/or Extend the Hearing Date filed by Cartier, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOS ED ORDER To Allow Counsel for Plaintiff to Appear Telephonically at Hearing and/or Extend the Hearing Date, 20 MOTION to Strike Various Affirmative Defenses of Defendants. Case Management Statement due by 2/20/2014. Case Manag ement Conference set for 2/27/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M.Chen on 1/23/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)
January 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Filing Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike Various Affirmative Defenses of Defendants filed by Cartier International AG. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/3/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cartier International AG et al v. Carter Cellars et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christy Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Envy Wines, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carter Cellars
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nils Venge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cartier
Represented By: J. Timothy Nardell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cartier International AG
Represented By: J. Timothy Nardell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?