Sevak & Sons, L.P., et al v. Shah et al
| Sevak & Sons, L.P.,, Chandrakant Shah and Mrudula C. Shah |
| Mohamed Poonja and Mobedshahi Hotel Group |
| San Jose Airport Hotel, LLC |
| USBC Manager-San Jose and Judge Arthur S. Weissbrodt |
| 5:2013cv04634 |
| October 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART JUDGMENT OF BANKRUPTCY COURT AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/17/2016. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court hereby issues an order to show cause requiring Appellant to investigate the status of the record in this action. Appellant shall file a brief declaration in response to this Order to Show Cause on or before 2/10/2014 . If Appellant does not file a response or otherwise fails to show good cause as directed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/29/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2014) Modified text on 1/29/2014 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
