Glassey et al v. Symmetricom, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael E McNeil and Todd S Glassey
Defendant: Symmetricom, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2013cv04662
Filed: October 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Cruz
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/6/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)
April 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/14/2014 01:00 PM. Plaintiffs' Show Cause Response due by 4/30/2014. Case Management Conference continued from 4/23/2014 to 5/14/2014 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 4/18/2014. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2014)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 30 . Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 25 set for 4/2/2014 01:00 PM. Opposition due 2/26/2014. Case Management Conference set for 4/23/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 2/10/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)
December 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES 18 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/12/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Joint case management statement due 3/5/2014. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/26/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2013)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER STIPULATION TO CONTINUE AS MODIFIED 15 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/12/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. The parties are reminded that a signed consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge must be filed by all parties before Magistrate Judge Cousins can consider the merits of the case or any substantive motion filed by any party. See Civ. L.R. 73-1. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/16/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glassey et al v. Symmetricom, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Symmetricom, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael E McNeil
Represented By: Ross Babbitt
Represented By: Brian Howard Mahany
Represented By: Anita Louise Steburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd S Glassey
Represented By: Brian Howard Mahany
Represented By: Ross Babbitt
Represented By: Anita Louise Steburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?