Letuligasenoa v. International Paper Company et al
| Melvyn Letuligasenoa |
| International Paper Company and Tin, Inc. |
| 5:2013cv05272 |
| November 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Remand. The Court has found that Defendants have not met their burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy in this case exceeds $5,000,000. Accordingly, the court GRAN TS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Clerk shall remand this action to Santa Clara Superior Court and CLOSE this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on May 20, 2014. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2014) Modified on text 5/20/2014 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court shall set a case management conference, if necessary, in its order on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Motions terminated: 32 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by International Paper Company. ***3/7/2014 CMC Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/3/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
