The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Plantronics Inc
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania |
Plantronics Inc |
5:2013cv05678 |
December 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Paul Singh Grewal |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Of Voluntary Dismissal Of Action [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 22, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014) |
Filing 24 ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL re 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Deadline to File Stipulation of Dismissal filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Dismissal due by 7/22/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/23/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Deadline to File Stipulation of Dismissal filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 23, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014) |
Filing 20 ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL re 19 Notice of Settlement filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/11/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2014) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Case Management Statement due by 4/9/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/23/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 1, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania filed by The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 16, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Plantronics Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania | |
Represented By: | Chet W Neilson |
Represented By: | Robert Kizzia Landen |
Represented By: | James P. Wagoner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Plantronics Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.