J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al
| J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. |
| Regents of the University of California and Eolas Technologies Inc. |
| 5:2013cv06003 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Dismissal filed by J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
67
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 66 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaims, and Continuing the Initial Case Management Conference filed by J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 21, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
55
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON. The Initial Case Management Conference in this action is continued to Friday, June 20, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 18, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2014)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MARCH 17, 2014 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; DIRECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 31, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER VACATING APRIL 4, 2014 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 28, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2014)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY JOHN RICHARD JOHNSON II PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY JOHN B. CAMPBELL PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 20, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
34
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 14, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY DIANE K. LETTELLEIR PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPY. Defendants are DIRECTED to submit in singlesided format a chambers copy of their motion to dismiss 18 . Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 19, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
21
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER THEREON. The hearing on the motion is continued from March 21, 2014 to March 28, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 18, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 23, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
