Harris v. Hasan Abbas et al
| Seth D. Harris |
| Stanford Yellow Cab, All Bay Taxi Cab, Sayed Hasan Abbas, Stanford Yellow Cab Palo Alto, Yellow Cab Allbay, Yellow Cab, Yellow Cab Santa Clara, AAA Legancy Limousine, Inc.,, Stanford Yellow Cab, Inc, First Choice Logistics, Inc., Yellow Cab of Stanford, Yellow AAA Cab, All BayYellow Cab and Los Altos Yellow Cab |
| 5:2013mc80030 |
| February 13, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION TO ENFORCE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS. The Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction. Petitioner may initiate a subsequent enforcement proceeding, if necessary, by filing a new Petition and accomplishing service of process consistent with the discussion above. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/15/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/6/2013. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/15/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/22/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
