in Re GOOGLE INC. GMAIL LITIGATION
| Keith Dunbar, Brad Scott, Todd Harrington, BRENT MATTHEW SCOTT, A.K., Matthew C Knowles and KRISTEN BRINKMAN |
| Google, Inc. |
| 5:2013md02430 |
| April 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERKS LETTER to USDC, Eastern District of Pennsylvania requesting transfer of C.A. No. 2:12-06699 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS LETTER to USDC, District of Maryland requesting transfer of C.A. No. 1:12-02022 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS LETTER to USDC, Southern District of Illinois requesting transfer of C.A. No. 3:12-01179 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS LETTER to USDC, Northern District of Florida requesting transfer of C.A. No. 4:12-00614 (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013) |
Filing 1
MDL TRANSFER ORDER: pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A are transferred to the Northern District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in that district. Signed by Judge MDL PANEL on 4/1/2013. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
