Morici v. HashFast Technologies LLC
Plaintiff: Pete Morici
Defendant: HashFast Technologies LLC, HashFast LLC, Simon Barber and Eduardo deCastro
Case Number: 5:2014cv00087
Filed: January 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER GRANTING 121 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Pete Morici. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/4/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2016)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In order to determine whether and how Plaintiff intends to proceed with those claims, the court schedules this action for a Case Management Conference at 10:00 a.m. on 2/18/2016. Plaintiff shall file an updated Case Management Conference Statement on or before 2/11/2016 which contains his proposal for the remaining claims. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/20/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2016)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court finds that a scheduling conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference scheduled for November 19, 2015, is VACATED. As represented in the report, Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment as to Eduardo DeCastro by November 16, 2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/13/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)
August 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/14/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request to Appear Telephonically at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/1/2015. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2015)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 57 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Any amended complaint shall be filed on or before 3/16/2015. The hearing scheduled for 3/5/2015 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/27/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2015)
December 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER RE: SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT EDUARDO DECASTRO. On or before December 15, 2014, the law firm of Zuber Lawler & Del Duca LLP shall file a notice of the docket with provides a physical mailing address, other than an e-mail address, for Defendant Eduardo DeCastro. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/10/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2014)
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE. Having reviewed the joint statement filed on November 14, 2014 (re 36 ) and in light of the more recent developments in this action, the court has determined that a status conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Status Conference scheduled for November 21, 2014, is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/18/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2014)
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 24 Motion for Limited Relief from Stay. The hearing scheduled for 10/10/2014 is VACATED. The Individual Defendants shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 10/27/2014. The court schedules this acti on for a Case Management Conference at 10:00 a.m. on 12/12/2014. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before 12/5/2014. The Clerk shall reopen this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/6/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morici v. HashFast Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pete Morici
Represented By: Venkat Balasubramani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HashFast Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HashFast LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Simon Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eduardo deCastro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?