William Aviles Hardwood Floors v. JTEKT Corporation et al
| William Aviles Hardwood Floors |
| Schaeffler Group USA Inc., Schaeffler AG, NSK Americas, Inc., NSK Ltd, Nachi America Inc., Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp., Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., JTEKT Corporation, AB SKF, SKF USA, Inc., NTN Corporation and NTN USA Corporation |
| 5:2014cv00114 |
| January 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| William H. Orrick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER re 91 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to File Certain Portions of Amended Complaint Under Seal. Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental declaration and, if applicable, brief in support of sealing that addresses the deficiencies identified in this order. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/13/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2014)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER Granting 127 Stipulated Request to Vacate Status Conference. Case Management Conference set for 8/7/2014 is HEREBY VACATED. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/1/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2014)
|
|
Filing
99
Order Denying, Without Prejudice, 91 Administrative Motion to File Certain Portions of Amended Complaint Under Seal. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 7/16/2014.(blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
