Simmons v. Maguire Correctional Facility of San Mateo County et al
| Rob Joseph Simmons |
| Maguire Correctional Facility of San Mateo County and San Mateo County Jail |
| 5:2014cv00528 |
| February 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J. Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Petitioner has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the Court was correct in its procedural ruling that Petitioner had failed to notify the Court of his current address after mail directed to him was returned to the Court as not deliverable. Accordingly, the COA is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall transmit a copy of this Order to the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/8/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Petitioner by the Court was returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Petitioner of a new address. Accordingly, the instant habeas action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/3/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
