McGibney et al v. Retzlaff
James McGibney and ViaView, Inc. |
Thomas Retzlaff, Neal Rauhauser and Lane Lipton |
5:2014cv01059 |
March 6, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 202 ORDER DENYING 201 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/11/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2015) |
Filing 197 ORDER DENYING 175 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; DENYING 177 MOTION TO STRIKE as moot; DENYING 185 , 186 MOTIONS TO SEAL JUDICIAL RECORDS. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/5/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2015) |
Filing 173 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 6/18/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015) |
Filing 171 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 7/16/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/23/2015 01:30 PM.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 06/17/2015. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015) |
Filing 164 ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENTS 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 161 , 162 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 4/15/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015) |
Filing 160 ORDER SUBMITTING MOTIONS; VACATING HEARING DATES re 126 , 132 , 134 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 4/7/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2015) |
Filing 152 ORDER STRIKING 105 , 124 DECLARATIONS OF NON-PARTY; DENYING 145 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. 144 , 149 DENIED as moot. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 2/10/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015) |
Filing 142 ORDER GRANTING 137 REQUEST TO SUBMIT LATE-FILED DOCUMENT; GRANTING 140 MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Defendant shall arrange his appearance through CourtCall in advance of each hearing. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/27/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2015) |
Filing 136 ORDER SUBMITTING 59 MOTION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT AND VACATING HEARING; CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement Due 4/23/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/30/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/15/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015) |
Filing 131 ORDER STRIKING IMPROPERLY FILED NOTICES re 122 , 129 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/6/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015) |
Filing 109 Order Terminating 15 , 16 Motions by Defendant Lane Lipton. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 12/4/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014) |
Filing 102 ORDER granting 23 Defendant Thomas Retzlaff's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction With Limited Leave to Amend. Defendant's 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is terminated with leave to refile after Plaintiffs file their amended complaint. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/20/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2014) |
Filing 94 ORDER ON MOTIONS: Administrative Motion 82 granted in part and denied in part. 79 , 84 are STRICKEN. Motion 89 to Appoint Counsel is denied. Second Motion 90 to Appear by Telephone for November 20th hearing is granted. Defendant shall arrange appearance through CourtCall. Defendant Neal Rauhauser is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/14/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014) |
Filing 81 ORDER Rescheduling Time for Motions Hearing re 23 , 24 , 26 , 29 ; Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2014 at 08:45 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/28/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014) |
Filing 78 ORDER re Motions: 72 MOTION Strike Plaintiffs' Opposition to Anti-SLAPP Motion is DENIED; 73 MOTION to Appear by Telephone is DENIED; 74 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply and For Additional Pages is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN P ART; 76 Emergency MOTION to Seal Case is DENIED without prejudice. Page 26 of Plaintiffs' Opposition 69 is STRICKEN, preserving the signature. The deadline for Defendant's Reply is extended to 10/24/2014, no excess pages permitted. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/17/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2014) |
Filing 65 ORDER re Defendant Retzlaff's Letter and Notice, re 53 , 64 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/3/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2014) |
Filing 63 ORDER Denying Administrative Motions, re 58 , 61 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/23/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014) |
Filing 40 Order denying 36 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/22/2014.(blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014) |
Filing 34 ORDER STRIKING 32 Objection, filed by Lane Lipton. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/14/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014) |
Filing 18 Order Granting 17 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Defendant Lipton's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. Responses due by 7/31/2014. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 7/16/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.