Davis v. City of San Jose et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Davis
Defendant: City of San Jose, Michael Montonye, Tyler Krauel and Thomas Boyle
Case Number: 5:2014cv02035
Filed: May 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 62 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/11/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015)
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and, by 3/9/2015, submit a stipulation and proposed order selecting an ADR process and the deadline by which to complete it. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 2/23/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 44 . Last day to hear dispositive motions is 8/13/2015. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/28/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 Order granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/24/2014.(blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 7 , 8 MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 6/20/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. City of San Jose et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Davis
Represented By: John L. Burris
Represented By: DeWitt Marcellus Lacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Jose
Represented By: Erich Joseph Lidl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Montonye
Represented By: Erich Joseph Lidl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Krauel
Represented By: Erich Joseph Lidl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Boyle
Represented By: Erich Joseph Lidl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?