Davis v. City of San Jose et al
Anthony Davis |
City of San Jose, Michael Montonye, Tyler Krauel and Thomas Boyle |
5:2014cv02035 |
May 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Paul Singh Grewal |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 62 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/11/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015) |
Filing 54 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and, by 3/9/2015, submit a stipulation and proposed order selecting an ADR process and the deadline by which to complete it. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 2/23/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015) |
Filing 50 AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 44 . Last day to hear dispositive motions is 8/13/2015. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/28/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014) |
Filing 42 Order granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/24/2014.(blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 7 , 8 MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 6/20/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.