Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al
Plaintiff: Think Computer Corporation, Think Computer Foundation and Aaron J. Greenspan
Defendant: United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, American Bar Association, Michel Ishakian, Wendell Skidgel, Richard W. Wieking and Claudia Wilken
Case Number: 5:2014cv02396
Filed: May 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 SCHEDULING ORDER re 37 MOTION to Dismiss filed by American Bar Association, 36 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard W. Wieking, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Administrative Off ice of the United States Courts, Michel Ishakian, Wendell Skidgel, Claudia Wilken, 34 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Think Computer Corporation, Think Computer Foundation, Aaron J. Greenspan. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/21/14. (srmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER of Recusal. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/28/2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER re 24 Response to Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/17/2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER CORRECTING 19 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/13/2014. The prior Order contained a typographical error in the calculation of the date on which Plaintiffs' response to the Order was due. This Order corrects that typographical error, and sets Plaintiffs' response to be due by July 13, 2014. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 11 Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief to Extend the Time by Which the American Bar Association Must Respond to the Complaint filed by American Bar Association. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/11/2014. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Bar Association
Represented By: Bety Javidzad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michel Ishakian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendell Skidgel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard W. Wieking
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claudia Wilken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Think Computer Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Think Computer Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron J. Greenspan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?