Andrew Maxwell et al v. Djaffar Chetouane
Andrew Maxwell, DHMM, LLC and Susan Imperial |
Djaffar Chetouane |
5:2014cv02643 |
June 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Alameda |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 Order Continuing Status Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/11/16. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016) |
Filing 32 Order Setting Status Conference and Directing Plaintiffs to File a Status Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/19/16. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2016) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying without prejudice 28 Motion for Default Judgment. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2015) Modified on 9/8/2015 (hrllc1, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 27 INTERIM ORDER Re Motion for Default Judgment 21 . The May 19, 2015 hearing on the Motion for Default Judgment is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/18/2015. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2015) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 8 Plaintiffs' Motion for Alternative Service of Process; vacating September 16, 2014 hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 9/12/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2014) Modified on 9/12/2014 (hrllc1, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.