Payoda, Inc. v. Photon Infotech, Inc.
Plaintiff: Payoda, Inc.
Defendant: Photon Infotech, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2014cv04103
Filed: September 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING 71 MOTION FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS AND DECLINING TO RULE ON 73 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.(blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 9/11/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2015)
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/17/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 7/30/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/12/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2015)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/14/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 4/3/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2015)
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO QUASH, UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 35 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2015)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING 11 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING 22 DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE. Amended complaint due by 4/14/2015. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 3/24/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2015)
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 17 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 11/19/2014. Replies due by 12/3/2014. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/3/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payoda, Inc. v. Photon Infotech, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Payoda, Inc.
Represented By: Craig Alan Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Photon Infotech, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Sargent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?