MCU Clocking Solutions Inc. v. Atmel Corporation
Plaintiff: MCU Clocking Solutions Inc.
Defendant: Atmel Corporation
Case Number: 5:2015cv02212
Filed: May 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCU Clocking Solutions Inc. v. Atmel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MCU Clocking Solutions Inc.
Represented By: Christopher D. Banys
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Edward Flynn
Represented By: Jennifer Lu Gilbert
Represented By: Christopher J Judge
Represented By: Vasilios Emmanuel Sanios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atmel Corporation
Represented By: Jody Barillare
Represented By: Colm F. Connolly
Represented By: Ahren C. Hsu-Hoffman
Represented By: Michael Lyons
Represented By: Michael John Lyons
Represented By: Walter S. Tester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?