Gonzalez v. Adams

Gonzalez v. Adams

Petitioner:	Gonzalez Alejandro
Respondent:	Vincent Adams
Case Number:	4:2015cv02348
Filed:	May 27, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Alameda
Presiding Judge:	Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 17, 2018	Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. After a careful review of the record and pertinent law, the Court concludes that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Further, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. The clerk shall terminate any pending motions, enter judgment in favor of Respondent, and close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/17/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)
July 17, 2015	Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The court has reviewed the § 2254 Petition and has determined that it warrants a response from Respondent. Accordingly, the court orders Respondent to show cause why the petition sho uld not be granted, as follows: The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this Order to Show Cause and the Petition and all attachments (Docket Item No. 1) upon Respondent. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on Petitioner, within sixty (60) days of the date this order is filed. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 9/15/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/16/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 17, 2018

Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. After a careful review of the record and pertinent law, the Court concludes that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Further, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. The clerk shall terminate any pending motions, enter judgment in favor of Respondent, and close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/17/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2018)

July 17, 2015

Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The court has reviewed the § 2254 Petition and has determined that it warrants a response from Respondent. Accordingly, the court orders Respondent to show cause why the petition sho uld not be granted, as follows: The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this Order to Show Cause and the Petition and all attachments (Docket Item No. 1) upon Respondent. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on Petitioner, within sixty (60) days of the date this order is filed. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 9/15/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/16/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Adams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gonzalez Alejandro
Represented By:	Mark David Greenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Vincent Adams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?