Behzadi v. Law Office of Rory W. Clark

Plaintiff: Behnam Behzadi
Defendant: Law Office of Rory W. Clark
Case Number: 5:2015cv02736
Filed: June 18, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 21, 2015 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Stipulated dismissal due by 11/5/2015. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 11/10/2015 and parties to appear for Show Cause Hearing set for 11/17/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 9/21/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Behzadi v. Law Office of Rory W. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Behnam Behzadi
Represented By: Crosby Scott Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Law Office of Rory W. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?