Aaron v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Wanda Aaron |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., Capital One Financial Corporation, WebBank and Wells Fargo Financial National Bank |
| 5:2015cv02951 |
| June 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER re Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/24/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER OF REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED re 16-802. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/23/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER to File Joint Case Management Statement. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/19/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Requiring Exchange of Initial Disclosures and Continuing Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/22/2016. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)
|
|
Filing
43
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on September 30, 2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/1/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
