Pamela Kotalik v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Pamela Kotalik |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, Discover Bank, Wells Fargo Financial National Bank, AR Strat and Sears Brands, LLC |
| 5:2015cv03863 |
| August 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING 62 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Pamela Kotalik, Terminating 61 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Pamela Kotalik. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. AR Strat terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/7/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 3/7/2016, file or cause to be filed a Case Management Conference Statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/4/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Because the parties have since complied with its requirements and demonstrated good cause in response, the Order to Show Cause issued on November 17, 2015 (Docket Item No. 35), is DISCHARGED. The hearing scheduled for December 3, 2015, is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/24/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING 39 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Pamela Kotalik. Discover Bank terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/20/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 29 Order re: ADR Referral. The parties are ordered to appear on 12/3/2015 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why the court should not impose any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this a ction, on the parties, or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order. The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions should not be imposed on or before 11/25/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/17/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court issues the instant OSC requiring that Plaintiff, no later than 11/17/2015, either: (1) file documents to show proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on Sears; or (2) explain in writing why service has not been accomplished. No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/12/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING 20 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Financial National Bank. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint shall by continued to November 5, 2015. This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/23/2015. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
