Mullins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Patrick Mullins |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Patelco Credit Union and Rash Curtis & Associates |
5:2015cv04276 |
September 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Paul Singh Grewal |
Ronald M. Whyte |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER re 22 Initial Case Management Conference. Amended Pleadings (First Amended Complaint) due by 1/29/2016. Initial Disclosures due 2/28/2016. Expert Disclosures due by 8/1/2016. Expert Rebuttals due 9/1/2016. Fact a nd Expert Discovery Cutoff date is 12/1/2016. Last day to file dispositive motions 3/1/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/22/2017 at 02:00 PM. Jury Selection/Trial (est. 3 days) set for 7/10/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jos e before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. A MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE is to be held before Magistrate Judge Grewall prior to the pretrial conference. The parties are to contact Magistrate Judge Grewall directly to schedule the settlement conference. See Order for other specified dates. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/22/2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016) Modified settlement conference text on 1/24/2016 (amkS, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.