Williams-Obanion v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Richard Williams-Obanion |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., Transunion, LLC, Bank of America, National Association, Macy's, Inc., Sound Credit Union, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo Card Services, National Association, Barclay's Bank Delaware, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Access Capital Services, Inc., Southwest Credit Systems, L.P., Fresno Credit Bureau, Credit Consulting Service, Inc., Kings Credit Services, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and PMGI, LLC |
5:2015cv04331 |
September 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Edward J. Davila |
Paul Singh Grewal |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 12:00 p.m. on 9/27/2016, either (1) file both a Status Conference Statement and a dismissal of Defendant Kings Credit Services, or (2) otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why the claims should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the claims with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Status Conference scheduled for 9/29/2016 is VACATED and will be reset if necessary upon resolution of the issue addressed herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/23/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2016) |
Filing 120 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE. The Status Conference scheduled for 8/4/2016 is CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on 9/1/2016. The parties shall file an updated Joint Status Conference Statement on or before 8/25/2016 which, inter alia, (1) is jointly prepared on behalf of all parties who have appeared in this action and for whom a dismissal has not yet been filed as of that date, and (2) provides a deadline by which a dismissal will be filed for any defendant who is not dismissed prior to that date. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/1/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2016) |
Filing 107 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Because Plaintiff has since complied with its requirements, the Order to Show Cause issued on 5/12/2016 101 , is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/24/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016) |
Filing 101 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why all claims against Defendants Access Capital Services, Inc., Kings Credit Services, and PMGI, LLC should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff d oes not, by 5/19/2016, either (1) request the Clerk enter the defaults Defendants Access Capital Services, Inc., Kings Credit Services, and PMGI, LLC or otherwise resolve or dismiss claims against them, or (2) demonstrate good cause in writing why th e claims should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss them with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/12/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016) |
Filing 94 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. In light of the order dismissing Credit Consulting Service, Inc. (Dkt. No. 92 ), the order to show cause issued on March 11, 2016, is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/21/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2016) |
Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING 91 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Richard Williams-Obanion. Credit Consulting Service, Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/17/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016) |
Filing 90 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The 120-day period for service provided by Rule 4(m) expired on January 13, 2016. Accordingly, the court issues the instant Order to Show Cause (OSC) requiring that Plaintiff, no later than March 18, 2016, either: (1) file do cuments to show proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on Credit Consulting Service, Inc.; or (2) explain in writing why service has not been accomplished. No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the cour t. Plaintiff is notified that the court will dismiss Credit Consulting Service, Inc. if Plaintiff fails to comply with this OSC or otherwise fails to show good cause as directed above. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/10/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2016) |
Filing 78 ORDER GRANTING 74 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Richard Williams-Obanion. Fresno Credit Bureau terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/24/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016) |
Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING 70 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Richard Williams-Obanion. Macy's, Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/22/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016) |
Filing 51 ORDER GRANTING 49 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Richard Williams-Obanion. Southwest Credit Systems, L.P. terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/2/15. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2015) |
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING 36 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Compfiled by HSBC Bank USA, National Association. Plaintiff Richard Williams-Obanion and Defendant HSBC BANK USA, N.A. by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that the time for Defendant HSBC BANK USA, N.A. to respond to the complaint in this action shall be extended to November 19, 2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/26/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.