Razavi v. Schluchter

Plaintiff: Melina Razavi
Defendant: Nicholas Schluchter
Case Number: 5:2015cv04353
Filed: September 21, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 1, 2016 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TRANSFERRING to the San Francisco or Oakland Divisions. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 1, 2016. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016) Modified on 3/1/2016 (cv, COURT STAFF).
December 30, 2015 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 30, 2015, re 9 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Razavi v. Schluchter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melina Razavi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas Schluchter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?