Lee, et al v. The Hertz Corporation, et al
Peter Lee and Latonya Campbell |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and The Hertz Corporation |
3:2015cv04562 |
October 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
San Francisco |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Employment |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER GRANTING 47 MOTION TO DISMISS AND REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/2/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2016) |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 42 STIPULATION CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2016 11:00 AM. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2016) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING 13 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.(blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2016) |
Filing 26 ORDER SCHEDULING 13 MOTION TO STAY FOR JANUARY 21, 2016. Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2016 09:00 AM before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/18/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015) |
Filing 24 ORDER SCHEDULING 13 MOTION TO STAY FOR MARCH 17, 2016. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/17/2015. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.