Yashar Mehdad v. DIRECTV, Inc.

Plaintiff: Yashar Mehdad
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv00113
Filed: January 8, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Referring Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 5, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RE 20 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/5/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)
March 11, 2016 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 16 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT DIRECTV. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/11/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yashar Mehdad v. DIRECTV, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yashar Mehdad
Represented By: Michael S Agruss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc.
Represented By: Becca J Wahlquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?