Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc.
Plaintiff: Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Egnyte, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv00120
Filed: January 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 133 Discovery Letter Brief. Defendant shall supplement its production as provided within 14 days of this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore Re: 132 Joint Discovery Letter Brief. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2018)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 129 Stipulation Extending Fact and Expert Discovery Deadlines.Close of Fact Discovery due by 1/11/2019; Designation of Experts due by 2/1/2019 and Designation of Rebuttal Experts due by 3/1/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 123 Stipulation Request for Order Extending Fact and Discovery Deadlines. Close of Fact Discovery due by 11/21/2018; Designation of Experts due by 1/9/2018; Designation of Rebuttal Experts d ue by 2/21/2019; Close of Expert Discovery due by 4/19/2019; Dispositive Motion due by 5/17/2019; Motions due by 5/17/2019; Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2019 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 117 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Heaven, Geoffrey. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 115 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Khassian, Heather.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2018)
June 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER Granting 108 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel Shailendra K. Maheshwari. Attorney Shailendra K Maheshwari terminated. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/4/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018)
December 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE 83 MOTION TO SEAL.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2017)
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 90 Stipulation Re Docket No. 86 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017)
October 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 85 Stipulation RE PAGE LIMITS FOR PARTIES CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFS. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 76 Stipulated Protective Order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2017)
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information for Patent Litigation filed by Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/10/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2017)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting (65) Stipulation in Case 3:16-cv-00120-HSG; (78) in Case 3:16-cv-02026-HSG to Continue Case. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2017)
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Withdraw Counsel Andrew M. Grodin.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Re Bock, Joel.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Re Maheshwari, Shailendra.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Re Goetzel, Dwayne (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: JOEL NATHAN BOCK
Represented By: Joel N. Bock
Represented By: Sarah S Eskandari
Represented By: Andrew Marc Grodin
Represented By: Mark Lee Hogge
Represented By: Nicholas Hunt Jackson
Represented By: Shailendra K Maheshwari
Represented By: Anne K Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Egnyte, Inc.
Represented By: Eric I. Abraham
Represented By: Ryan T. Beard
Represented By: Dwayne K. Goetzel
Represented By: Eric B. Meyertons
Represented By: Christina Lynn Saveriano
Represented By: Neil Arthur Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?