Goldberg v. Vimo, Inc.
Goldberg and Todd Goldberg |
Vimo, Inc. and Vimo, Inc. doing business as GetInsured.com |
5:2016cv00188 |
January 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R Lloyd |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. § 227 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER re #24 Stipulation of Dismissal. Case dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The clerk shall close this file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/20/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE filed by Todd Goldberg. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 6/20/2016) |
Filing 23 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Stipulated dismissal due by 6/20/2016. If dismissal not filed by that date, then parties' Show Cause Response due by 6/28/2016 and parties to appear for Show Cause Hearing set for 7/5/2016 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/21/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016) |
Filing 22 ERRATA RE Document #21 Notice of Settlement by Todd Goldberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/20/2016) |
Filing 21 NOTICE by Todd Goldberg Of Settlement (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/20/2016) |
Filing 20 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/19/2016) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Witt W Chang (Chang, Witt) (Filed on 4/19/2016) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Ari N. Rothman (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 4/19/2016) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting #14 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Deadline for mediation: 90 days from the date of this order. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2016) |
Filing 16 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Lula, Daniel) (Filed on 4/8/2016) |
Filing 15 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/8/2016) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Todd Goldberg filed by Todd Goldberg. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 4/7/2016) |
ADR Clerk's Notice of Withdrawal of Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order (re: doc #13 ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order) (ewh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016) |
Filing 13 ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order (ewh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2016) Modified on 3/28/2016 CLERK ERROR: PLEASE DISREGARD ATTACHED PDF, IT WAS FILED IN ERROR. (ewh, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Vimo, Inc... (Lula, Daniel) (Filed on 3/14/2016) |
Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Vimo, Inc. (Lula, Daniel) (Filed on 3/11/2016) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byVimo, Inc.. (Lula, Daniel) (Filed on 3/11/2016) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Please take notice that, due to the court's trial calendar, the Initial Case Management Conference has been continued to 4/26/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. A Joint Case Management Statement is due by 4/19/2016. All other related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2016) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 3/14/2016. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR VIMO, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY TWENTY-EIGHT (28) DAYS filed by Vimo, Inc.. (Lula, Daniel) (Filed on 2/10/2016) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Todd Goldberg.. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 1/20/2016) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Vimo, Inc.. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/5/2016. Case Management Conference set for 4/12/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. by 1/27/2016. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 1/12/2016) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-10128876.). Filed byTodd Goldberg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedman, Todd) (Filed on 1/12/2016) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.