UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund v. Mayer et al
| UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund |
| Marissa Mayer, David Filo, Sue James, Thomas J McInerney, Charles R. Schwab, H. Lee Scott, Jr., Kenneth A. Goldman, Ronald S. Bell, Henrique De Castro, Max R. Levchin, Jane E. Shaw, Maynard Webb, Jr. and Yahoo! Inc. |
| 5:2016cv00478 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 79 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2017)
|
|
Filing
78
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 77 Setting Schedule on Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Initial Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 1/19/2017 Continued to 3/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/28/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 29 Motion to Dismiss; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2016)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING JUNE 16, 2016 HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/14/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
