Paragon Mechanical, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines

Plaintiff: Paragon Mechanical, Inc.
Defendant: Estes Express Lines
Case Number: 5:2016cv00880
Filed: February 23, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 17, 2016 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Court to retain jurisdiction for 30 days to enforce the settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/16/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paragon Mechanical, Inc. v. Estes Express Lines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paragon Mechanical, Inc.
Represented By: David W. Lively
Represented By: Brian R. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estes Express Lines
Represented By: Grover A. Perrigue, III
Represented By: Lawrence J. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?