Guerrero v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
| David Guerrero |
| Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC |
| 5:2016cv01519 |
| March 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING 31 , 37 CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.'S AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/14/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING 12 MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/17/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016)
|
|
Filing
35
CASE MANGEMENT ORDER re 34 Case Management Conference - Initial, Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions set for 01/11/2018 at 9:00 AM. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2018 01:30 PM. Jury Selection set for 4/16/2018 09:00 AM before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Jury Trial set for 4/16/2018, 04/17/2018, 04/18/2018, 04/19/2018, 04/20/2018, 04/23/2018, 04/24/2018, 04/25/2018, 04/26/2018 and 04/27/2018 at 09:00 AM before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Case referred to ADR for Mediation. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 06/30/2016. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
