Bennett v. The People

Petitioner: David Bennett
Respondent: The People
Case Number: 5:2016cv01918
Filed: April 12, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Los Angeles
Referring Judge: PSLC CLA
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 17, 2017 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge James Donato denying 28 Motion for Hearing; denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2017)
August 8, 2017 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge James Donato denying 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 18 Motion to Vacate ; denying 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 22 Motion for Protective Order; denying 23 Motion to Dismiss. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennett v. The People
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The People
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?