Reynaldo Llamas v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Reynaldo Llamas |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and TD Bank USA, National Association |
| 5:2016cv02164 |
| April 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/11/2017 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 5/4/2017. All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates, including those scheduled in the Pretrial Order 57 , are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/7/2017. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2017)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/6/2017. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Chase Bank USA, N.A. Erroneously sued as JPMorgan Chase Bank, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/21/2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING 20 Stipulation filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Response due 6/28/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/16/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
