Paul Ponomarenko v. Nathan Shapiro et al
| Paul Ponomarenko |
| Nathan Shapiro and Project Vegas Mansion |
| 5:2016cv02763 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING IN PART 59 PLAINTIFF AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT SHAPIRO'S COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT; GRANTING 74 SHAPIRO'S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE; TRANSFERRING CASE TO DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/5/2018. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2018)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER GRANTING 68 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/11/2017. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2017)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER DENYING 64 PLAINTIFF AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/21/2017. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING 27 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION; AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/3/2017. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
