Dana Franco v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Dana Franco |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, CIG Financial, A California Corporation and Creditor's Protection Service, Inc. |
| 5:2016cv03334 |
| June 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Show Cause Response due by 6/16/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/26/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER GRANTING 50 DEFENDANT CIG'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amended Pleadings due by 5/9/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/18/2017.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2017)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 5/1/2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/17/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER SUBMITTING 63 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT; VACATING HEARING; AND DENYING MOTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/14/2017. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
