Capelli Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Fantastic Sams Salons Corporation et al
Capelli Enterprises, Inc., Nameer Jalel and Aseel Issa |
Fantastic Sams Salons Corporation and Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation |
5:2016cv03401 |
June 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Action or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Action Pending Arbitration. The hearing scheduled for 1/17/2017 is VACATED. This action is STAYED in its entirety pending the final resolution of the arbitration. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/13/2017. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2017) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying 20 Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016) |
Filing 22 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiffs do not, by 8/19/2016, file a written response that demonstrates the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice. No hearing will be held on the Order to Show Cause unless ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/17/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.