Krawitt et al v. Infosys Technologies Limited, Incorporated et al
| 5:2016cv04141 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh Granting 84 Apple's Motion to Dismiss; Denying as Moot 85 Infosys' Motion to Dismiss. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019)
|
|
Filing
89
Order by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi denying without prejudice 88 Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order. The parties may either submit a revised proposed protective order that addresses the concerns noted, or they may submit a joint discovery dispute letter that explains why the current proposed provisions should be adopted, notwithstanding the Court's concerns. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2019)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 55 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 56 Motion to Dismiss. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Krawitt et al v. Infosys Technologies Limited, Incorporated et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
