Sunil Kumaran Vethody et al v. National Default Services Corporation et al
Sunil Kumaran Vethody and Bindu Baburajan Vethody |
National Default Services Corporation and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
5:2016cv04713 |
August 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. 4/2/2019 Show Cause Hearing is VACATED. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/27/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
Filing 120 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re SETTLEMENT. Stipulated dismissal due by 3/19/2019. Show Cause Response due by 3/26/2019. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/2/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 1/18/2019. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019) |
Filing 106 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K DeMarchi DISMISSING CLAIMS 1-4 and DENYING 100 Motion for Summary Judgment re CLAIM 5. (vkdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018) |
Filing 78 Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 68 motion to dismiss claims five and six of the first amended complaint. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2017) |
Filing 32 Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part Dkt. No. 10 Motion to Dismiss. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.