Garcia v. McDowell
| Esequiel Garcia |
| Neil McDowell |
| 5:2016cv05301 |
| September 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| PSLC HHL |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Denying 93 Motion for Reconsideration re 93 MOTION for Reconsideration re 87 Order, filed by Esequiel Garcia. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Denying 95 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/11/2023: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tsh, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DISCOVERY by Judge Beth Labson Freeman Denying 82 Motion. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY; DENYING MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING MOTION FOR fourth EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/17/2021. Traverse due by 7/16/2021. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER GRANTING THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE re 69 Notice (Other), filed by Esequiel Garcia. Traverse due by 1/4/2021. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/3/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE re 64 Notice (Other) filed by Esequiel Garcia. Traverse due by 11/3/2020. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/22/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE re 62 Notice (Other) filed by Esequiel Garcia. Traverse due by 9/22/2020.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/24/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 51 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 51 MOTION for Extension of Time to Fi le Response/Reply as to 50 . (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 41 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Application for Extension of Time to File Answer to Order to Show Cause. Habeas Answer due by 4/20/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2020)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DENYING MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/18/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED PETITION by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend 31 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend 29 Order on Motion to Reopen Case, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct. Second Amended Pleadings due by 5/13/2019. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/29/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garcia v. McDowell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Esequiel Garcia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Neil McDowell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
