Timothy Glick v. Performant Financial Corporation
Timothy Glick |
Performant Financial Corporation |
5:2016cv05461 |
September 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jon S. Tigar |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 56 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Dismiss filed by Performant Financial Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 10, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) |
Filing 43 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying 35 Motion to Stay. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2017) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Timothy Glick filed by Timothy Glick. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2017) |
Filing 31 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Protective Order) filed by Performant Financial Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2017) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Timothy Glick filed by Timothy Glick. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 19, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.