Thomas v. Santoro

Defendant: Kelly Santoro
Petitioner: Mark R. Thomas
Case Number: 5:2016cv05646
Filed: October 5, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2017 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING 17 MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/31/2017. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2017)
October 19, 2016 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 12/19/2016. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/19/2016. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Santoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark R. Thomas
Represented By: Victor D. Vertner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Santoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?