Alejandro Picazo v. Randstad US, LP et al
Plaintiff: Alejandro Picazo
Defendant: Randstad US, LP
Case Number: 5:2016cv06644
Filed: November 16, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER RE RECENT FILINGS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on January 22, 2026. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2026)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER denying 110 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/8/2018. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2018)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 57 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 97 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; terminating 75 , 80 , 89 , 96 , 102 . The clerk shall enter judgment and close this file. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2018)
January 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 78 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2018)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 61 defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery; and Amending Case Schedule. Fact discovery cutoff: 11/20/2017. Last day for hearing dispositive motions: 1/16/2018 , 10:00 AM. Designation of experts with reports: 2/28/2018. Designation of rebuttal experts with reports: 3/14/2018. Expert discovery cutoff: 4/6/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. 11 /14/2017 hearing re 57 plaintiff's summary judgment motion vacated, to be re-set to coincide with hearing on defendant's anticipated summary judgment motion.(hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2017) Modified on 10/11/2017 (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF).
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd conditionally granting 14 plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw; denying as moot 19 motion to appear by telephone. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alejandro Picazo v. Randstad US, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randstad US, LP
Represented By: Michael Edward Harvey
Represented By: Michael Anderson Wahlander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandro Picazo
Represented By: Rita Ming-Yuen Leong
Represented By: Roman Otkupman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?