Dowling v. County of Santa Clara

Plaintiff: Evan W Dowling
Defendant: County of Santa Clara
Case Number: 5:2016cv06866
Filed: November 29, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29:621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 6, 2017 62 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING 24 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING 27 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM CLAIMS PRESENTATION REQUIREMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/6/2017. The 12/14/2017 hearing is vacated. No appearance necessary. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dowling v. County of Santa Clara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evan W Dowling
Represented By: Moira Collette McQuaid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Santa Clara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?