Xilinx, Inc. v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1

Plaintiff: Xilinx, Inc.
Defendant: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Case Number: 5:2017cv00509
Filed: February 1, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 29, 2017 30 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RE SERVICE AND MOTION TO DISMISS RE SERVICE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/29/2017. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xilinx, Inc. v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xilinx, Inc.
Represented By: David B. Cochran
Represented By: William Edward Devitt
Represented By: Michael A Lavine
Represented By: Joe Chuan-Che Liu
Represented By: Patrick Thomas Michael
Represented By: Lidiya A. Mishchenko
Represented By: Krista Sue Schwartz
Represented By: Matthew James Silveira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Represented By: Jill Fawn Kopeikin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?