Pizano v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Juan Antonio Pizano
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2017cv03030
Filed: May 25, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2018 30 Opinion or Order of the Court Order granting in part and denying in part 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 28 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Case remanded for reconsideration consistent with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/31/2018. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pizano v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Antonio Pizano
Represented By: Marc V. Kalagian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?