Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE et al
| Updateme Inc. |
| Axel Springer SE, Axel Springer Services Inc., Axel Springer Digital Ventures GMBH and Upday GMBH & Co. KG |
| 5:2017cv05054 |
| August 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Susan Illston |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/15/18. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2018)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler adjudicating 158 Discovery Letter Brief, 160 Discovery Letter Brief.As set forth in the attached order, the court (1) denies the defendants' motion for a protective order preventing Dr. Dopfner's deposition and (2) grants the plaintiff's motion to quash the defendants' deposition subpoena to Dr. Eschelbeck. The court adopts the plaintiff's proposed compromise to limit Dr. Dropfner's deposition to five hours and directs the parties to negotiate in good faith to schedule a time and place for the deposition. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2018)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler adjudicating 153 Letter Brief re Discovery Dispute Between Plaintiff and Defendants. As set forth in the attached order, the court orders the defendants to randomly select 10% of the unreviewed "Ajax" documents, review them (and their associated family members) for responsiveness, produce responsive documents (and a privilege log for any responsive documents that are withheld), and provide a chart listing the number of documents and families revie wed and the rate of responsiveness (including and not including withheld document). The defendants must complete this process within one week. Following completion, if the parties continue to have disputes regarding discovery of the "Ajax" documents, they should meet and confer. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler addressing 147 Discovery Letter Brief, 148 Discovery Letter Brief. As set forth in the attached order, the undersigned directs Updateme and Flipboard to meet and confer in person or by phone for no less t han one hour regarding their discovery dispute. If they are unable to resolve their dispute, they may submit a joint letter brief in conformance with the undersigned's standing order. To account for the fact that Updateme's counsel is currently in London on depositions, the undersigned gives the parties two weeks, i.e., until October 2, 2018, to meet and confer and to submit any further joint letter brief. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018)
|
|
Filing
129
Discovery Order. The attached order memorializes the rulings at the 8/2/2018 hearing. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 63 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/7/2018)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO SEAL 90 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/27/2018)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE 53 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/5/2018)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 15 27 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/27/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
